Judge kills suit claiming ‘crunchberrries’ aren’t real fruit

“This Court is not aware of, nor has Plaintiff alleged the existence of, any actual fruit referred to as a “crunchberry.” … A reasonable consumer would not be deceived into believing that the Product in the instant case contained a fruit that does not exist. . . . So far as this Court has been made aware, there is no such fruit growing in the wild or occurring naturally in any part of the world.”

“Plaintiff did not explain why she could not reasonably have figured this out at any point during the four years she alleged she bought Cap’n Crunch with Crunchberries in reliance on defendant’s fraud.”

(Read the full story: here)

I too would like to win the lottery but, not at the expense of the Cap’n. PAK


~ by pakeener on June 9, 2009.

One Response to “Judge kills suit claiming ‘crunchberrries’ aren’t real fruit”

  1. Oh it gets better… you missed the part in the fine print at the bottom of the story where the woman previously tried to sue Froot Loops because they didn’t contain ‘real froot.’

    Of course she had eaten these for FOUR YEARS before she tried to figure out that they didn’t contain real fruit…

    …”Here’s yer sign…”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: